State’s Rights

The flag is waving less vigorously todayIn a blow to State’s Rights and the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal government can prosecute users of doctor prescribed medical marijuana. Glaucoma patients didn’t see this coming.

From cnn.com: In a dissent, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (Stanford ’52) said that states should be allowed to set their own rules. “The states’ core police powers have always included authority to define criminal law and to protect the health, safety, and welfare of their citizens,” said O’Connor, who was joined by other states’ rights advocates. Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Clarence Thomas joined O’Connor in dissention.

I guess they teach reading comprehension and Constitutional Law at Stanford, courses that the six other justices need to revisit.

Totally unrelated, props to the House of Representatives who passed a bill to expand stem cell research under thread of Bush veto. Victories like these are these over the crazies in the Religious Wrong are too few and far between.

4 thoughts on “State’s Rights”

  1. At no point in my rambling, incoherant diatribe did I pretend to use proper grammar. Ass.

    Perhaps you’d care to sign up for the job? The pay sucks but the benefits are…actually none.

  2. Fortunately, that while the decision allows federal prosecution of marijuana offenses, the specific language of the decision allows for the argument of medical necessity to be used as a defense in criminal proceedings. It will be interesting to see how the first few test cases turn out.

  3. So does this mean that the apocalyptic battle between the US and canada- as foretold in the south park movie- has been moved up?
    PS Props on the new preview function

Comments are closed.